Added a proposal for the daemon/gui communication.

1 files changed, 22 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/noncore/net/wellenreiter/docs/specification b/noncore/net/wellenreiter/docs/specification
index d833451..0766ef4 100644
--- a/noncore/net/wellenreiter/docs/specification
+++ b/noncore/net/wellenreiter/docs/specification
@@ -47,2 +47,6 @@ The whole content of this file cannot be specified yet.
 
+OPIE specific: Opie contains a bunch of high-level configuration classes,
+which are used by most Opie applications. It should be discussed whether
+to use this structure / API (preferred) or use a proprietary one.
+
 
@@ -60,3 +64,20 @@ it will be directly send to the GUI to be able to sniff in realtime.
 
-Not yet specified.
+The GUI and the daemon run as threads within one process, where the GUI
+thread will be the main thread. Both the daemon and the GUI thread are
+(mostly) "free-running". Once the GUI thread is started and has finished
+its initializations, it jumps into the Qt event loop ( QApplication::exec() ).
+
+If the daemon thread is actively working and -
+for instance - has acquired interesting data for the GUI thread to display,
+it calls a special reentrant method of the GUI thread ( QApplication::postEvent )
+either transmitting the whole data structure or saying "Hey, there's interesting data
+for you", which the GUI thread then retrieves. 
+To enable a free running daemon thread to actually receive messages from the
+GUI thread, it's useful to to include a non-blocking check-for-messages-function
+within the daemon main loop <since it is waiting for messages from a GUI thread,
+this function has not be called very often>. If applicable, the daemon thread must
+not call this function but only monitor some guarded variables from time to time
+which the GUI thread can modify to alter the behaviour of the daemon thread.
+
+IMHO this is a much more leightweight design than to use a proprietary udp-socket protocol.